Robert Half Alternatives for Global Remote Hiring

Struggling with global remote hiring? Traditional staffing models like Robert Half may not meet the demands of today’s distributed workforce. This guide breaks down four hiring options - Robert Half, RemotelyTalents.com, enterprise staffing firms, and tech-focused platforms like Terminal.io - so you can choose the best fit for your needs.

Key Takeaways:

• Robert Half: Works well for local and contract-to-hire roles but struggles with global reach and transparent pricing.
• RemotelyTalents.com: Flat monthly fees ($1,450 per open role) and a 90-day guarantee make it ideal for startups and SMBs hiring remote talent in Europe, Latin America, and North America.
• Enterprise Staffing Firms (e.g., Randstad, Adecco): Best for large-scale hiring across multiple countries but may lack the speed and focus smaller teams need.
• Tech Platforms (e.g., Terminal.io): Specialize in nearshore technical talent with faster hiring timelines, though they focus primarily on engineering roles.

Quick Comparison:

Want faster hiring, predictable costs, and access to top remote talent? Read on to find the right approach for your business.

1. Robert Half

Founded in 1948, Robert Half operates in 20 major markets, including the U.S., Canada, the UK, Germany, Brazil, and Australia ^[7]. While the company does provide remote staffing options, its original focus on local contract-to-hire and direct-hire placements poses challenges for hiring in regions outside its established markets. This can be a significant drawback for businesses looking to hire globally with flexibility.

Here’s a closer look at how Robert Half performs in terms of geographic reach, pricing, hiring timelines, role specialization, and compliance.

Geographic Focus

Robert Half’s operations are limited to the countries where it has physical offices, restricting recruitment to these specific regions ^[7]. This can be a major obstacle if you need talent from areas outside these established markets. As Adesuwa Ebuehi from Terminal.io explains:

Robert Half is not fully global in its recruitment or hiring. It only provides staffing in [approximately 20] countries... These are also the locations where it staffs its offices ^[7].

Pricing Transparency

One challenge with Robert Half is the lack of published pricing, which makes it harder to plan costs upfront ^[7]. The company uses a traditional markup model, charging 30% to 50% above a contractor's hourly rate ^[6]. For permanent hires, fees are calculated as a percentage of the candidate's first-year salary ^[7]. This lack of clarity can complicate budget planning and make it difficult to compare costs with other providers.

Time-to-Hire

Robert Half is known for relatively quick hiring for back-office and IT contract-to-hire roles ^[2], with an average time-to-hire of 9 days for standard software engineering positions ^[7]. However, filling senior-level roles can take anywhere from 5 to 11 weeks ^[7]. For businesses needing to scale quickly or fill urgent positions, these longer timelines for senior roles could slow progress.

Role Specialization

The company focuses on staffing for finance, accounting, IT, legal, customer support, and administrative roles ^[2][7]. Since 1994, its Robert Half Technology division has specialized in technical staffing ^[8]. While the firm covers a broad range of roles, this generalist approach might not meet the specific needs of highly specialized technical positions ^[7].

Compliance and Risk Management

Robert Half offers standard background checks and compliance protocols as part of its services ^[2]. However, it does not provide integrated onboarding support or Employer of Record (EOR) services ^[7]. This means employers must handle onboarding, payroll setup, and cross-border compliance themselves, increasing administrative burdens and legal risks. Without EOR services, managing a global remote workforce becomes more complex and time-consuming.

sbb-itb-88a7fe6

2. RemotelyTalents.com

RemotelyTalents.com takes a fresh approach to recruitment, offering a subscription-based service tailored for global remote hiring. Unlike traditional agencies with hidden fees and limited reach, this platform is built for the demands of a remote-first world.

RemotelyTalents.com operates as a subscription-based recruitment agency, focusing exclusively on remote hiring in Europe, Latin America, and North America ^[1]. Its flat monthly fee model is designed for startups and growing teams, providing predictable costs and quicker hiring processes.

Geographic Focus

The agency specializes in three key regions: Europe (with a focus on Central and Eastern Europe), Latin America, and North America ^[1][4]. This regional focus allows them to develop a deep understanding of local talent markets, including time zone compatibility, compensation norms, and cultural nuances. However, for companies seeking talent in Asia or Australia, this agency may not be the best fit.

Pricing Transparency

RemotelyTalents.com offers two straightforward pricing plans ^[1]:

• On-Demand Plan: Priced at $1,450 per month per open role, this plan is ideal for teams filling 1–3 positions and doesn’t require long-term commitments.
• Partner Plan: At $1,000 per month, this option requires a 12-month commitment and allows unlimited hires (one active project at a time).

Both plans include a 90-day replacement guarantee and weekly updates via Slack. This pricing model stands in stark contrast to traditional agencies that charge percentage-based fees for permanent hires.

Time-to-Hire

The average hiring process takes 5–7 weeks, with some roles being filled in as little as 14–21 days ^[1][4]. CEO Kay Tayam of 88 Affect highlighted the agency’s speed, pricing, and transparency ^[1]. Similarly, Kevin, Founder of Kiki Commerce, shared that within three weeks, RemotelyTalents.com identified three candidates who perfectly matched his needs for a Shopify front-end developer ^[1].

Role Specialization

RemotelyTalents.com focuses on four core areas:

• Marketing & eCommerce: Roles like SEO specialists, SEM experts, and Amazon specialists.
• IT/Data & Engineering: Positions such as UI/UX designers, QA testers, and Web3/Crypto developers.
• Operations & VAs: Including executive assistants and operations managers.
• Finance & Accounting: Roles like bookkeepers and financial analysts.

The agency taps into a pre-screened database of over 10,000 candidates and has supported more than 250 companies ^[1]. While they excel at matching specialized roles, managing cross-border compliance remains a challenge for clients.

Compliance and Risk Management

To mitigate hiring risks, RemotelyTalents.com offers a 90-day replacement guarantee for all placements ^[1]. However, it does not provide Employer of Record (EOR) services, meaning companies must handle payroll, benefits, and compliance on their own. This setup adds some administrative responsibility for businesses operating across borders.

3. Enterprise Staffing Firms (Randstad, Adecco)

Enterprise staffing firms like Randstad and Adecco operate on a massive scale, catering to high-volume contract programs across multiple countries. For example, Adecco deploys an impressive 2 million associates daily in over 60 countries ^[9]. If you're managing a remote hiring initiative that spans continents, these firms have the infrastructure to handle it.

Geographic Focus

Adecco focuses on North America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific ^[2], while Randstad maintains a similarly extensive global presence. This broad reach makes them ideal for businesses needing to staff teams across multiple time zones simultaneously. However, their wide-ranging approach might lack the local expertise that smaller, specialized agencies can offer, particularly in regions like Latin America.

Pricing Transparency

Pricing models with these firms differ significantly from modern remote-first agencies. Both Randstad and Adecco rely on quote-based pricing ^[2]. For context, traditional enterprise firms like Robert Half often apply markups of 30% to 50% on a contractor's hourly pay ^[6]. This can make budgeting more complex, especially for startups or mid-sized companies that need predictable costs.

Time-to-Hire

Randstad typically delivers candidate profiles within 5 business days, though senior roles may take 5–11 weeks ^[6][7]. While this timeline is competitive for high-volume hiring, it may not match the speed of specialized remote-first providers. On the plus side, Adecco's "Aspire Academy" offers free upskilling in areas like IT and leadership, which can help reduce ramp-up times for new hires ^[9].

Role Specialization

These firms are generalists by design. Adecco covers a wide range of workforce solutions, including IT, HR services, administrative support, finance, and healthcare ^[2]. Randstad operates similarly, offering staffing services across diverse sectors. While this broad coverage is useful for filling a variety of roles, it may fall short when it comes to highly specialized positions that require niche expertise.

Compliance and Risk Management

Enterprise staffing firms excel in compliance and risk management. Both Adecco and Randstad are well-versed in navigating complex international labor laws, offering services like multi-country payroll coordination, compliance safeguards, and background checks to address risks such as worker misclassification ^[2]. For companies dealing with multi-country hiring programs, this level of operational security is invaluable. However, these services often come with higher costs and less flexibility compared to smaller, remote-first agencies.

The table below provides a quick comparison of geographic focus, ideal use cases, and operational ratings for these firms to help guide your decision-making process.

4. Tech-Focused Hiring Platforms (Terminal.io)

Tech-focused hiring platforms are tailored specifically for companies building distributed engineering teams. Unlike general staffing firms, these platforms zero in on roles like software engineering, data science, and cybersecurity ^[2]. This focus is crucial in a market where the U.S. is projected to face a shortfall of over one million IT roles ^[5].

Geographic Focus

Platforms like Terminal.io target regions known for their strong engineering talent and compatible time zones with U.S.-based teams. Latin America is a top choice, offering 4–8 hours of overlap, which makes real-time collaboration seamless ^[2][5]. Eastern Europe is another popular region, particularly for its expertise in AI and cybersecurity. However, it offers slightly less overlap, with 3–5 hours of shared working hours ^[2]. These time zone alignments help speed up hiring and reduce compliance hurdles for U.S. companies.

Pricing Transparency

One standout feature of tech-focused platforms is their upfront pricing models, a departure from the hidden fees often associated with traditional staffing firms. These platforms typically offer flat monthly rates or success fees ^[2]. Their itemized breakdowns cover salaries, employer obligations, benefits, and platform fees (PEPM) ^[3]. This approach streamlines processes like sourcing, vetting, and compliance under one contract, ensuring predictable costs and eliminating surprise charges. Terminal.io’s transparent pricing pairs well with its specialized vetting process, which is explained in the next section.

Role Specialization

These platforms shine when it comes to technical screening. They go beyond simple resume reviews, incorporating coding rubrics and performance benchmarks that generalist firms rarely offer ^[2]. This rigorous vetting process significantly lowers the risk of hiring mistakes, especially for senior engineering roles, where a bad hire can derail months of progress and team morale. However, if your hiring needs extend to non-technical roles like marketing or finance, these platforms may not be the best option. This focused approach highlights the advantages of tech-specific hiring solutions, setting the stage for a deeper look into how different staffing models compare. If you're ready to build your team, you can schedule a consultation to discuss your specific hiring needs.

Pros and Cons Comparison

Here’s a quick breakdown of the pros and cons for each hiring model we’ve reviewed. The best choice will hinge on factors like the complexity of the role, your budget, and how quickly you need to make a hire.

Robert Half stands out for its expertise in high-volume contract-to-hire placements, especially in traditional corporate roles like accounting, legal, and IT. Their global infrastructure is a major plus, but the percentage-based fees can be a challenge for startups and smaller teams ^[2].

On the other hand, RemotelyTalents.com offers a straightforward flat fee of $1,450 per month per open role, with no long-term obligations. Most positions are filled within 5–7 weeks, making this an appealing option for small to mid-sized companies that value cost predictability and need skilled remote professionals across Europe and Latin America ^[1].

For larger organizations, enterprise staffing firms like Adecco and Randstad are ideal for handling high-volume contracts and managing payroll across multiple countries. These firms excel at scaling up, but their services are better suited for businesses with complex, large-scale hiring requirements ^[2]. Meanwhile, tech-focused platforms like Terminal.io are great for U.S.-based tech companies. They specialize in nearshore technical talent and rigorous vetting, though their focus on tech roles may not work for non-technical hiring needs.

Here’s a side-by-side look at the key factors:

In summary, startups and smaller teams looking to fill a few critical roles might find the flat-fee model from RemotelyTalents.com to be the best fit. Larger enterprises with complex, multi-country hiring needs may prefer the extensive resources and reach of enterprise staffing firms. Each option offers distinct advantages depending on your priorities ^[1][2].

Next, we’ll explore how these factors can shape your final hiring decision.

Conclusion

When it comes to global remote hiring, the key factors to weigh are cost predictability, speed, and regional expertise. Robert Half works well for high-volume, contract-to-hire placements, but its percentage-based fees and generalized approach can slow down the hiring process for remote roles. Similarly, enterprise staffing giants like Randstad and Adecco cater to large-scale operations, which may not align with the more tailored needs of remote-first companies. This makes specialized, flat-fee solutions an appealing alternative for businesses aiming to streamline their hiring process.

For startups and SMBs looking to fill 1–3 specialized remote positions, RemotelyTalents.com stands out. With a flat fee of $1,450 per month, access to senior recruiters, and a 90-day guarantee, it offers a straightforward and efficient hiring experience. Most roles are filled within 5–7 weeks, and their focus on Europe and Latin America ensures access to skilled talent at competitive rates ^[1]. This approach aligns perfectly with the essentials of budget management, speed, and compliance for global remote hiring.

Industry leaders have praised this model:

"I've tried a lot of remote talent services before for our remote expansion as a US company, and they delivered an experience that was superior in speed, pricing, and transparency." - Kay Tayam, CEO, 88 Affect ^[10]

If you’re hiring for critical roles in Marketing, IT, or Finance and want to avoid placement fees exceeding $5,000, RemotelyTalents.com offers a compelling solution. With regional expertise, transparent pricing, and a proven track record of success with over 250 companies, it’s an excellent choice for distributed teams ^[1].

Take the next step: Schedule a free consultation today to define your hiring needs and secure top talent with their 90-day guarantee.

Related Blog Posts

• US-Based Remote Staffing Agency Connecting You to Top Global Talent
• 12 Best Remote Recruitment Agencies to Hire Global Talent
• Robert Half Review 2025: Features, Pros, Cons, and Top Alternatives
• 12 Best Recruitment Agencies for Remote Talent in 2026